Politics

Attorney Calls DNC ‘The Ultimate Ponzi Scheme’: They Screwed Bernie

on

Even Democrats are fed up with the obvious bias occurring within their own party.

During the 2016 presidential primary candidate campaigning, the Democratic Party narrowed the field down to Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders. However the support for both candidates was skewed by the DNC who claimed impartiality but was clearly partial to Clinton’s campaign. In Response the DNC is now being sued by an organization that donated under the false representation of impartiality.

Via Breitbart:

Backers of Bernie Sanders are suing the Democratic National Committee (DNC) for fraud based on last summer’s hacks revealing systemic bias for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 primary campaign.

The class-action lawsuit, Wilding v. DNC Services Corp., is underway in federal court in Florida, where it is awaiting a ruling on the DNC’s motion to dismiss heard in April. The plaintiff class, Bernie donors who also gave money to the DNC under the assumption of its impartiality in the 2016 primary contest between Clinton and Sanders. The suit alleges fraud, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, and a consumer protection violation.

The claims are based on the celebrated leaked emails and memos from the “Guccifer 2.0” hacks last June. The leaks appear to show direct assistance of Secretary Clinton to the detriment of Senator Sanders. The novel legal theory is based on the donors having been duped by the DNC’s claims of impartiality.

Attorney Jared Beck of Beck & Lee Trial Lawyers, the firm representing the class of Bernie supporters, spoke with Breitbart News about the developing case and the surrounding controversies.

Bernie Sanders would’ve won the Democratic nomination if the Party was not corrupt beyond repair.

About Barry G. Morris

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *