Politics

LIBERAL HACK Nancy Pelosi Tries and FAILS Miserably to Take Down Neil Gorsuch

on

Nancy Pelosi clearly needs a good fact check before she goes after an opponent.

Everything she said can be disputed with actual facts. Nice try Nancy but all you managed to was look pathetic.

According to Daily Wire- On Tuesday night, appearing at a CNN townhall moderated by Jake Tapper, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi attacked Neil Gorsuch, President Trump’s nominee for the Supreme Court, with typical leftist hyperbolic rhetoric, snapping, “Clean air, clean water, food safety, safety in medicine, and the rest, if you care about that for your children, he’s not your guy.”

Elections have ramifications, and here is a living, breathing example of it. The president and his first appointment to the court, and hopefully his only appointment to the court, has appointed someone who has come down on the side of corporate America versus class action suits on securities fraud. He’s come down against employer’s — employee’s rights. Clean air, clean water, food safety, safety in medicine, and the rest, if you care about that for your children, he’s not your guy. Gabby Giffords’ group, the group for responsible solutions related to gun safety, said that he comes down on the side of felons, over gun safety. Hostile to women’s reproductive rights, Hobby Lobby case, for example.

The list goes on and on; criticized progressives for bringing cases that relate to LGBT progress, taking those cases to the courts. What saddens me the most, as a mom and a grandmother though, is his hostility toward children in school, children with autism. He has ruled that they don’t have the same rights under the IDEA that children — that they could reach their intellectual and social advancement under the law. He has said that doesn’t apply to them. He’s come down against them under ADA as well, and again, under IDEA. So, it’s a very hostile appointment, Hail fellow, well-met, lovely family, I’m sure, but as far as your family is concerned, and all of us, if you breathe air, drink water, eat food, take medicine, or in any other way, interact with the courts, this is a very bad decision. Well outside the mainstream of American legal thought, not committed to Supreme Court precedents, Supreme Court precedents.

Just to set the record straight vis-à-vis a couple of Pelosi’s rambling accusations:

Gorsuch is not utterly hostile on environmental issues: In 2015, Gorsuch affirmed that Colorado’s renewable energy law, which required that utilities get 30 percent of the electricity they sell to Colorado customers from renewable resources, did not violate the Constitution. The law required that utilities get 30 percent of the electricity they sell to Colorado customers from renewable resources. Why, even leftist Think Progress hailed the ruling as “Judge Shuts Down Attack On Colorado’s Ambitious Clean Energy Law.”

Women’s “reproductive rights”: In the Hobby Lobby case, Gorsuch wrote that the birth control coverage mandate under the Affordable Care Act forced employers to “underwrite payments for drugs or devices that can have the effect of destroying a fertilized human egg.” It must be the fertilized human egg that bothers Pelosi, as Gorsuch has not had the opportunity to rule on a significant case involving abortion.

Continue reading here

About Contrarian American

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *