Climate Change Hoax

30,000 Scientists Agree: Climate Change is a Hoax

on

Although liberals are known for lying about anything and everything in order to sway the weak minded, their biggest lie of all comes in the form of climate change.

Environmental propaganda is used as the basis of all liberal policies they push on the country. Using statistics such as 97% of Scientists support global warming.

Turns out that 97% is based on specifically chosen surveys that portray what they want you to think. In reality 30,000 scientists say climate change is definitely a hoax concocted by Democrats such as Al Gore.

Via Truth and Action:

Long ago, Al Gore delivered us “an inconvenient truth” about climate change. Ironically, the most inconvenient thing about it may be that it’s not true at all.

Debunking the “97 percent” lie on top of those “inconvenient truths,” the White House’s assertion that 97 percent of scientists agree that global warming is real has been completely debunked. Several independently-researched examinations of the literature used to support the “97 percent” statement found that the conclusions were cherry-picked and misleading.

And, of course, there are the more than 31,000 American scientists (to date) who have signed a petition challenging the climate change narrative and 9,029 of them hold PhDs in their respective fields. But hey, Al Gore and his cronies have also ignored that inconvenient truth, as well.

Watch Here:

There you have it folks. Global warming and climate change equate to liberal BS.

About Contrarian American

25 Comments

  1. Mary

    February 27, 2017 at 8:22 am

    I agree, ? Earth is forever changing. Pangea. Earthquake. Flood. Those are all natural occurances and can totally change the land. Yes polution hurts the environment, but the worst hurt of all is litter. You don’t need governmental $1,000,000,000 agencies to eradicate litter. Duct tape won’t even fix stupid!

  2. charles young

    February 27, 2017 at 11:50 am

    Clean up litter, pollution and liberal untruths about climate change! Most of us want a clean environment. We do not need the landscape littered with Liberal BS which is used to leverage their desire to control everyone else.

  3. Sean.

    February 27, 2017 at 5:56 pm

    The government should spend money on teaching kids and adults not to litter. It puts tons of trash into our waterays, and especially the oceans. It also kills millions of wildlife every year too.

    • R. Ballard

      February 27, 2017 at 6:37 pm

      parents should teach their kids , not the government.

  4. Brandy

    February 27, 2017 at 10:21 pm

    30,000 SCIENTISTS are liberal liars, The Earth has always gone through Climate changes has nothing to do with people, machines or litter

    • dee stafford

      February 28, 2017 at 6:25 am

      Brandy, I think you misread. The 30,000 scientists say the global warming crowd like Gore and Obama don’t know what they are talking about and are using GW to control people and they support your belief that Climate changes have nothing to do with people or machines.

  5. Educated Foreigner

    February 28, 2017 at 5:58 am

    Climate change is a fabrication by the Democrats?
    American Republicans have to be the most idiotic and self obsessed morons to have ever walked the earth.
    America isn’t the only country in the world meatheads, and your politicians have no sway on what the rest of the world think.
    Studies across the world have come to the same conclusion that humans are dramatically altering the climate by deforestation, burning fossil fuels and the output from industry and farming.
    The USA is quickly becoming an international joke with a game show host as president who couldn’t tell the truth if he tried.
    A country that has banned the teaching of Darwin’s Theory in many of its states in preference of creationism has no place in doubting the findings of others.
    Besides, the world you believe in is only eight thousand years old, previous climate changes happened before the earth existed according to idiot America.

    • Marc Miller

      March 2, 2017 at 3:25 pm

      You’re ignorant. There are NO states that have banned the teaching of Darwin’s Theory. I’m sure 99% of Americans know the world is more than 8000 years old (it’s 6000 years old to the strict Bible interpreters, dumb ass). Even you yourself says that climates changes happened before, so why is this any different. There is NO proof of man made climate change when one studies the data that hasn’t been manipulated.

      • plusaf

        April 2, 2017 at 11:12 pm

        Marc, “EF” won’t believe OR understand your comments.

      • Donna

        April 3, 2017 at 5:06 pm

        No data on man made climate change is correct because prior to human inhabitation of the earth before the last ice age, there were no records of climate. There are climate changes. It happens every so many years and the earth has been going through this process since it’s planetary existence. Man’s habitation of the planet and our failure to take care of it will only hasten in the next change that much faster.

    • David Barton

      April 3, 2017 at 9:25 am

      Where to start? No state in this country has banned the teaching of Darwinism. Some states have proposed the teaching of Creationism as a theory. But that is a far cry from banning the theory of Darwinism.
      As for what other countries believe? Irrelevant here. Believe what you want in other countries, you are free to do so, but you don’t get to tell us what to believe.

    • Kirkz

      April 3, 2017 at 11:25 am

      Well said. A few more years of this shit and we’ll be 150 years behind the rest of the world wondering what the hell happened.

    • James stowe

      April 5, 2017 at 9:35 pm

      There are a whole bunch of folks that think like you meat head, even i agree with some of your idiotic bullshit but you are an idiot liberal and dont know your ass from a hole in the ground.

    • Cal Bradley

      April 10, 2017 at 6:30 pm

      You are incredibly stupid.
      Just because a majority of fools and/or countries have been duped to believe this garbage doesn’t make it true.
      Truth is truth even if no one believes it.
      A lie us a lie even if everyone believes it.

  6. James Tan.

    February 28, 2017 at 9:16 am

  7. Mel

    February 28, 2017 at 10:06 am

    It is all predicated on wealth redistribution, developed industrial nations footing the bill (carbon tax) so third world countries get a windfall. This is essential to the Soros dream of globalization and a new world order where the elite call the shots.

  8. Vicki

    February 28, 2017 at 11:51 am

    It’s nothing more than a tool to end capitalism and promote total dependence on the government (socialism) by imposing so many regulations, that people cannot afford create jobs in manufacturing.

  9. Wake UP

    March 1, 2017 at 12:05 am

    Is it normal for such lies like this to be posted as “news” on this website? The 30,000 claim is totally fabricated (not true). Does this site also censor facts refuting these lies (like most do)?
    Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming

    • Hf

      March 2, 2017 at 6:22 am

      This does not explicitly state the amount caused by humans. Just that 97% claim humans have “something” to do with it…hardly logical thinking. Did you even watch the video tied to the link? John Coleman explain why people like yourself have been sucked in. It is very easy to brainwash the weak minded. You and those 97% you talk of are the real science deniers.

  10. Douglas DeViney

    March 6, 2017 at 6:57 pm

    The word was out, practically from the start. The Brit. study claimed the participation of 1500+ climate scientists.
    Shortly after they published, most of the participants tried to get their names off the roster as they did not agree with the “findings”. The response was to the effect ‘but you did participate’ so it’s a valid statement that 1500 participated.
    Of the 39 reviews that were accepted, 97 agreed that man had something to do with Global Warming. Those selected few got funding. The others didn’t and were denied a voice. Their papers were always “debunked”. Each time the response to publications was simply “that’s already been debunked” Or “it’s settled science” which is about the most unscientific statement possible. That’s why they call it RE search

  11. Mary Crohan

    March 11, 2017 at 8:42 pm

    If ‘Climate Change’ was real, why did they keep having to change it’s name? During the 1970’s it was call ‘Global Cooling.’ Then the earth stopped cooling so they changed it to ‘Global Warming.’ The earth stopped warming in 1998. They had to find a name that they wouldn’t have to change again… CLIMATE CHANGE!! This will always be right, the Climate changes with the seasons.

  12. Caroline LaValle

    March 11, 2017 at 11:18 pm

    How can so many people believe a man who claimed to invent the internet?
    Doesn’t it even make you wonder a bit? But no, most get sucked in with the
    notorious left wing propagander vomited by the left …Just look at the crazies
    manic behaviour over the election vote? They have been stirred up to the point of total madness. With no sign of a cure.

  13. Pingback: 30,000 SCIENTISTS AGREE: CLIMATE CHANGE IS A HOAX -

  14. ChuckB

    April 4, 2017 at 2:56 pm

    “Climate Change” as portrayed by the “Al Gore Crowd” is bullshit. around 40 years ago “Scientists” were trying to figure out how to deal with Global cooling (ideas like melting the polar ice cap). Now we have “scientists” trying to figure out how to deal with Global Warming (greenhouse effect). Climate does change in the world, it was doing it before mankind was around and will likely be doing it after mankind destroys itself. The net effect caused by mankind is Relatively small.

  15. Colin King

    April 4, 2017 at 8:47 pm

    There is climate change, but that has always been so since the beginning of time. The real question is CC a natural occurrence or man made. I think the biggest contributor to CC is over population. We are often told that robots can do most of the manual work we do manually, so why not reduce our population by 50% over the next 100 years and then see what happens. A one child policy is a practical solution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *